week 3 issue position
Learning Goal: I’m working on a nursing writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Choose a case from the AMA Journal of Ethics Case Index (Links to an external site.) and take a position. For this assignment you will evaluate the ethical arguments for or against the issue. Identify the potential legal arguments (consider current federal guidelines), indicate any potential professional code conflicts you foresee, and support your position with an explanation of your own ethical/moral foundation.
In your 2-3 page paper:
- Identify the issue and state your ethical position.
- How might this scenario play out or impact you in your role as a nurse practitioner?
- Defend your position with legal, ethical, and professional evidence.
- As part of your position, propose strategies and solutions for addressing the issues.
- What other ethical issues does this case bring to light, if any?
Support your position with at least one scholarly source (it may be your text). Be sure to cite the article you choose, use APA format, and include a title page and reference page.
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Rubric
NURS_521_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric (2)
NURS_521_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric (2)
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
| 20 to >17.2 ptsProficient
The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment. |
17.2 to >15.0 ptsApproaches Proficiency
The response to the assignment is generally adequate, but may not be thorough. |
15 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The writer does not respond to the assignment. |
|
20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Detail |
| 18 to >15.48 ptsProficient
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information. |
15.48 to >13.5 ptsApproaches Proficiency
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information. |
13.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The topic and main ideas are not clear. |
|
18 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization |
| 14 to >12.04 ptsProficient
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong. |
12.04 to >10.5 ptsApproaches Proficiency
The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included. |
10.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion. |
|
14 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA |
| 8 to >6.88 ptsProficient
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. |
6.88 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Proficiency
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly. |
6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing. |
|
8 pts |
| Total Points: 60 |
